When the Lawyers Start Telling You What the Judges Really Said

You may recall a couple of weeks ago, when we got the SCOTUS ruling in Smith & Wesson v. Mexico, that Justice Kagan had left a real nugget in her majority opinion about the commonality and lawfulness of semi automatic rifles. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses two ongoing cases where plaintiff’s counsel informed the Court of this precedent and now those clamoring for civilian disarmament are freaking out and telling us not to pay attention to what the Supreme Court said. So learn what the playbook will be to combat this statement by a sitting Supreme Court justice so that you can be armed with education.

NAGR v. Lamont. https://gunrightsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/CT-response-letter-to-Smith-and-Wesson.pdf

RMGO v. Town of Superior. https://gunrightsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/Superior-Response-to-SW-Supplement.pdf
_____________________________________________________________________
Have a Video Idea, then Help WGL Out. https://forms.gle/GNCyRw1HRqvAmwik6

Subscribe to our Newsletter to stay up to date on all issues that affect your rights by going to https://www.washingtongunlaw.com/newsletter _________________________________________________________________________
Contact Washington Gun Law If you have any questions about this topic, or anything else related to what’s left of our Second Amendment Rights, remember you can always contact us at: www.washingtongunlaw.com or call us directly at 425-765-0487. Stay safe. ________________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble. https://rumble.com/c/WashingtonGunLaw

Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on X (Twitter) @GunWashington